What are the advantages/disadvantages of conducting virtual field trips vs. actual field trips?
Classrooms are changing as a result of “Innovative technologies and delivery strategies”, providing teachers with an array of tools to enhance or reinforce curriculum. As a result, teachers are “providing accessible learning opportunities through communications” that address the educational goals of the 21st Century learners (Teleconferencing A Training Kit, 2004). Through such activities as virtual tours, video tours and virtual field trips, the teacher can transport the classroom to locations around the world and elsewhere. These activities are not necessarily limited to geographical locations. For example, they can include a field trip through the human body. Virtual field trips are an excellent means of providing learning experiences and have many advantages over actual tours and field trips.
Terminology
Virtual Tour
“is a simulation of an existing location, usually composed of a sequence of
video images. They also may use other multimedia elements such as sound effects, music, narration, and text. The phrase ‘virtual tour’ is often used to describe a variety of video and photographic-based media” (Wikipedia – Virtual Tour, OCT 2010).
Many institutions use virtual tours to allow the viewer to simulate a walk through of a particular place. For instance, real estate property can be photographed and placed within a user interface, allowing potential buyers to view aspects of the listed property (room by room tour, outside features, neighborhood amenities).
Video Tour
“is a full motion video of a location. Unlike the virtual tour’s static
wrap-around feel, a video tour is as if you were walking through a location” (Wikipedia – Virtual Tour, OCT 2010).
National Geographic has many video tours online that are organized by topic. For instance, the Travel section has video tours of many countries, cities and parks around the world. Under the Animal section, a video of grizzly bears in Yellowstone or alligators in the Everglades can be found. Another example is a video tour under the Environment tab related to the BP oil spill in the gulf.
Virtual Field Trip
“is a guided exploration through the Web that organizes a collection
of pre-screened, thematically based web pages into a structured online learning experience (Foley, 2003).“
“It is an inter-related collection of images, supporting text and/or other media, delivered electronically via the World Wide Web, in a format that can be professionally presented to relate the essence of a visit to a time or place. The virtual experience becomes a unique part of the participants’ life experience (Nix, 1999).”
(Wikipedia – Virtual Tour, OCT 2010).
Internet search for virtual tours and field trips will yield multiple sites. For instance, using WikiFieldTrip.com a teacher can organize a tour by searching and saving locations of interests. Area maps are targeted with red interest points that provide links to Wikipedia articles, websites and information regarding the points of interest. Google Earth is a popular application, down-loadable from the Internet, with capabilities to organize a virtual field trip of the Earth, Moon and Mars. Through its layers panel, filters can be set to show specific criteria of viewing and as with WikiFieldTrip.com, the map populates with clickable icons that present pop-up windows filled with internet-linked information.
Real-time Virtual Field Trip
“involve the use of videoconferencing and audio
conferencing technologies to permit students in one location to virtually visit and learn about people or places in another location. In the case of interactive video conferencing, “students interact, in a live even, with a remotely located field trip host” (Cole, Ray, Zanetis 2004). In using a video tour, the videographer makes choices regarding the content and subject matter. Control is removed from the viewers and what is seen is the same for all those viewing the tour.”
(Wikipedia – Virtual Field Trip, OCT 2010).
An example using this technology can be found on the website of The Murphy Farm. In coordination with the Saginaw Intermediate School District, the Murphy Farm schedules interactive web field trips where students can visit the farm animals from the comfort of their classroom on a real-time virtual field trip. The students “interact live and discuss characteristics of farm animals, their habitat and usefulness” (Murphy Farm, 2006).
Advantages & Disadvantages
Cost-Effective
As economic issues affect funding and the Education Community is faced with the tasks of strategic spending, educators must get creative through use of technology. One of the most appealing advantages of providing a virtual tour or field trip is its cost-effectiveness. The expenses per student, in most instances, will be considerably less than an actual field trip or tour. A consideration of actual tours is entry fees may be discounted for large class size. The costs of travel and other associated expenses must be considered.
Site Selection
Factors such as distance, time, or disabilities of tour participants, do not limit site selection. For instance, a field trip to the moon is presently not possible. A classroom in Florida may find it difficult to take a field trip to the Rocky Mountains. Students that are constrained to a wheelchair can take a field trip to the Grand Canyon. Those students who are working or who may have other time scheduling issues can participate.
Security
Traveling with a group of students can present with anxiety-producing events such as a participant becoming separated from the group. Also, the personnel involved to chaperone the students can present added expenses. When students are young, this factor could deter many teachers from wanting to schedule an actual field trip. Safety of tour participants is of relatively little concern with virtual tours and field trips, which can free the teacher to concentrate on content, interactivity and participation.
Quality
Focus is unified, as all who participate will be directed to view only what is presented through the specific and consistent activity. The input from primary resources can provide multiple perspectives in one package facilitating cross-curriculum collaboration. “It can be designed to meet local specific requirements of training in terms of content, language and conditions” (Teleconferencing-A Training Kit, pp. 14-15, June 2004).
Interactivity
With teleconferencing in field trips and tours, interactivity can provide face-to-face interaction between students and the resource persons. This collaborative learning environment can foster motivation through engagement and real world context (Nix, p.9, 1999).
Sensory
When the need to actually experience the activities through touching, tasting and smelling, the virtual aspects of this method of delivery falls short. An example where the sensory experience cannot be transmitted through a virtual field trip would be a trip to the petting zoo or a bakery. There are some aspects of the actual field trip that cannot be experienced as CTE – Centre for Teaching Excellence Faculty Liaison Mary Powers writes “Until mosquito bites, the black fly bites and the hypothermia that comes after slogging hours in a downpour can be simulated; there will not be a perfect virtual field trip” (Power, 2009).
Online Resources
There are unlimited opportunities on the Internet that provide the resources for a virtual tour or field trip. Many sites provide lesson suggestions, presentations, lectures and other associated resources (current articles, whitepapers, images, website links). Many sites need to be evaluated for up to date information and links, which could utilize valuable time. There are a number of Internet-based businesses that can plan and produce virtual tours and field trips or videos but this option may include a fee.
References
Cole, C., Ray, K., Zanetis, J., (2004). Videoconferencing for K-12 Classrooms: A
Program Development Guide. ISTE, 2004. Retrieved on November 12, 2010 from:
http://eev2.liu.edu/westburyII/JG/assignments/bette/review_iste_videoconferencing.htm
Foley, K. (2003). The Big Pocket Guide to Using & Creating Virtual Field Trips (3rd ed.)
Persistent Vision.
Murphy Farm (2006). Visit via the Internet. Retrieved on November 12, 2010 from:
http://www.sisd.cc/education/components/scrapbook/default.php?sectiondetailid=1630&
Nix, R. K., (June 10, 1999). A Critical Evaluation of Science-Related
Virtual Field Trips. Retrieved on November 12, 2010 from: www.utdallas.edu/~rnix/VFT_eval.pdf
Power, M., (July, 2009). Virtual Field Tripping: A “Real” Way to Learn-Mary Power.
CTE – Centre for Teaching Excellence Blog. Retrieved on November 11, 2010 from: http://cte-blog.uwaterloo.ca/?p=714
Teleconferencing – A Training Kit (June, 2004). Commonwealth of Learning,
Commonwealth Educational Media Centre for Asia, Sec. 1, p 13.
Retrieved November 7, 2010 from: www.cemca.org/books/teleconf.pdf
Other Online Resources:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_tour
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_field_trip
http://www.wikifieldtrip.org/
http://virtual-field-trips.com/home/science/human-body
http://www.wired.com/geekdad/2009/11/digital-frog/
http://www.sciencedaily.com/videos/2005/1011-virtual_reality_field_trips.htm